火曜日, 5月 6, 2025
ホームVideoニュース尖閣領空侵犯 「日本の民間機が領空を侵犯した」と中国側が反論 日本は厳重抗議 再発防止強く求める

尖閣領空侵犯 「日本の民間機が領空を侵犯した」と中国側が反論 日本は厳重抗議 再発防止強く求める

沖縄県の尖閣諸島周辺で中国のヘリコプターが日本の領空を侵犯した問題を巡り、中国側が反論しました。

尖閣諸島周辺で3日、中国海警局の船から飛び立ったヘリコプター1機が日本の領空を侵犯し、日本政府は中国側に抗議しました。

これに対し中国外務省の劉勁松アジア局長は4日、北京の日本大使館の横地次席に対し「日本の民間機が領空を侵犯した」として日本側に反論し、厳正な申し入れを行いました。

一方、日本大使館によりますと、横地次席は劉局長に対し、中国側による領空侵犯などについて厳重に抗議するとともに再発防止を強く求めました。

中国海警局は3日、日本の民間航空機が先に「領空を侵犯した」と主張し「ヘリコプターで追い払った」などと発表していました。

FNNプライムオンライン
https://www.fnn.jp/

source

Views: 0

RELATED ARTICLES

48 コメント

  1. China has never recognized the sovereignty of the Diaoyu Islands as belonging to Japan at any time, which is again Japan's historical revisionism, the Diaoyu Islands on the 2012 Chinese 1960 map of the Japanese Foreign Minister belong to Japan, however, this is a magazine that cites the map of the "Declaration", which is the 1937 edition, and after the war, all of Japan's unequal treaties with the victim countries were abolished, and the Diaoyu Islands are clearly written and are part of the Taiwan archipelago, and the Taiwan issue is China's civil war, It is a de jure dispute between the government of the Republic of China and the government of the People's Republic of China, and Taiwan and the mainland have repeatedly jointly enforced the law to repel Japan's illegal occupation of the Diaoyu Islands

  2. The Bostan Proclamation was an entente jointly formulated by China, the United States, the Soviet Union and Britain to prevent the resurgence of fascism, stipulating that Japan had no right to claim sovereignty over other islands at the Ryukyu level, and at most only administrative power, and the Cairo Declaration stipulated its legal effect in accordance with Vienna international law, and was cited by Japan's unconditional surrender

  3. Article 34 of the Vienna Treaty of Development did not invite China, Southeast Asian countries and other countries that were victims of Japanese fascism and did not invite the Soviet Union, India and other large countries, and the legal effect did not exist, and it stipulated that Japan only had its executive power, not sovereignty, Article 34 of the Vienna Treaty of Development, the countries that did not invite the signatories, the treaty was not binding, there were 150 countries in the world at that time, and this treaty was only signed by more than 40 countries, and it was stipulated that Japan had no sovereignty over the Ryukyus, only administrative power

  4. 自衛隊の哨戒機に射撃管制レーダー照射されても、何もしなかった岩屋だもの。
    今回の尖閣だって何もしないと分かっているからこそ起きた中国ヘリの領空侵犯。
    これが憲法9条の精神に則った、何もしない外交なんだろうな石破、岩屋としては。

  5. First of all, what you said is taken out of context, all the order after World War II is dominated by the Bostan Proclamation and the Cairo Declaration, and our teacher taught us "can we start reasoning only when others are strong", not to mention that these treaties you said not only did not give Japan sovereignty, but also only unilateral treaties between the United States and Japan, and neither the victorious nor the victim agreed, if China was now a crazy country like Japan, then they would have disappeared from the world map long ago

  6. The U.S. peace treaty in San Francisco clearly stipulates that Japan only has "residual sovereignty" over the Ryukyus, that is, half of the governing rights, and has to pay 2 billion military expenses to the U.S. military stationed in Japan every year, and the 1972 Okinawa Treaty has not been resolved, and it only gives the right to govern completely to Japan, and these two announcements are only unilateral announcements between Japan and the United States, in order to receive the consent of the allies in the world anti-fascist war, and Japan still has to pay 2 billion military spending, the Bostan Proclamation and the Cairo Declaration clearly state that Japan only has sovereignty over the island of Honshu under any circumstances, And public opinion polls show that 41 percent of the Ryukyus people prefer independence, and the same is true of the 1895 takeover of the Diaoyu Islands, which was the Treaty of Shimonoseki signed by Japan in 1895 when Japan invaded China, and all unequal treaties with the invaded countries were abolished after Japan's defeat in the war

  7. だから、自衛隊出すぞコラって言えば良いんだっての。ほんとに出す出さないじゃないんだから。自衛隊出すぞって言ったとメディアで世界に発信すれば良いだけ。
    中国ってのは日本がヘタレだから既成事実を作りたいからやってるのと、日本の世論が変わってるから日本政府の出方を探っているんだよ。
    中国には上から目線で、やるかコラって言えば良い。それが台湾有事が起きる時期を遅らせられる外交だ。

  8. 大使の召喚、応じなければ退去命令くらいすべき段階に入ったと思いますよ。100年計画で国を盗る、じわじわ侵略を進める作戦です。フェーズが1段階変わりました。

  9. 森山と斉藤がパンダ外交に行った結果がこのしっぺ返し。
    てめえら参院選どうなるか分かってんだろうな!
    こんな事が無くても自民、公明、立民、共産、れいわ、社民には入れないけどね~

  10. この有様で戦略的互恵関係って言う口先だけの大嘘つきチュウゴク野郎。イシバやイワヤは日本の主権を毀損する亡国の政治屋です。*いつもの水掛け論になっているが大使を帰国させる位の大事件ですよ*

返事を書く

あなたのコメントを入力してください。
ここにあなたの名前を入力してください

- Advertisment -

Most Popular